Pelister vs Bashkimi Kumanovo: Prediction, Odds & Analysis
Our model leans Pelister (76% probability), high confidence.
Win probabilities
Recent form
Expected goals
Most likely scorelines
Scoreline probability matrix
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 9 | 4 | ||||
| 1 | 18 | 8 | 2 | |||
| 2 | 17 | 8 | 2 | |||
| 3 | 11 | 5 | 1 | |||
| 4 | 5 | 2 | ||||
| 5 | 2 |
Each cell shows the probability (%) of that exact scoreline (home goals down the side, away goals across the top). Computed from a Poisson model on expected goals.
Key points
- The odds point to a clear favourite.
- Recent form favours Bashkimi Kumanovo.
- The head-to-head history is finely balanced.
- Pelister have home advantage.
- Goals outlook: a tight, low-scoring game likely.
Betting angles
Assessments compare our model probability with the bookmaker odds. "Value" means our model rates the pick higher than the market implies. Not betting advice.
Value radar
Markets where our model disagrees with the bookmaker. A positive edge means our model rates the outcome more likely than the odds imply — a potential value spot.
Match DNA
Full analysis
The model blends the odds, head-to-head history, recent form and absentees to frame this clash between Pelister and Bashkimi Kumanovo. After removing the bookmaker margin, the probabilities settle at 76% for Pelister, 7% for the draw and 16% for Bashkimi Kumanovo.
Several signals point toward Pelister. The odds point to a clear favourite. Pelister have home advantage.
Across the last 6 meetings, the record reads 2 Pelister wins, 1 draws and 3 Bashkimi Kumanovo wins. Recent scorelines: 1-0, 1-2, 1-2, 4-0, 1-3.
If the trend holds, a scoreline around 1-0 is plausible — treat it as a pointer, not a certainty.
On form, Pelister show D-L-D-W-L across their recent outings, while Bashkimi Kumanovo read D-D-W-W-W. Recent momentum carries weight in the assessment, particularly when combined with home advantage and the competition context.
On the secondary markets, our model puts over 2.5 goals at 42% and both teams to score at 30%. The profile leans toward a tighter, lower-scoring game.
Our model flags a disagreement with the market on "Bashkimi Kumanovo" (1X2): we rate it 16% versus the 14% implied by odds of 6.60 — an edge of 2.5 points. That's where the market appears to underrate the true likelihood.
This prediction is a statistical analysis, not a guarantee. Higher confidence means the signals agree more strongly — but football is unpredictable. Always bet responsibly.
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite, Pelister or Bashkimi Kumanovo?
Our model rates Pelister as the most likely outcome at 76% probability.
What's a likely scoreline for Pelister vs Bashkimi Kumanovo?
A scoreline around 1-0 fits our analysis — as a pointer, not a certainty.
What's the head-to-head record?
In the last 6 meetings: 2 Pelister wins, 1 draws, 3 Bashkimi Kumanovo wins.
Over or under 2.5 goals?
The indicators lean toward under 2.5 goals.
Odds movement
illustrative trendMatch statistics
Match story
How the game unfoldedCautious start, both sides feeling each other out. (0–0)
Pelister make it count (Unknown (24')). It's 1–0 at this point.
Half-time score: Pelister 1 – 0 Bashkimi Kumanovo.
The game settles after the break without a breakthrough. (1–0)
A tense finish, but the scoreline stays put. (1–0)
League table
Republic of North Macedonia. First League| # | Team | GP | W | L | T | G | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | 26 | 2 | 5 | 80:21 | 83 | |
| 2 | 33 | 23 | 5 | 5 | 67:30 | 74 | |
| 3 | 33 | 19 | 9 | 5 | 68:28 | 62 | |
| 4 | 32 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 57:32 | 53 | |
| 5 | 33 | 13 | 13 | 7 | 50:53 | 46 | |
| 6 | 32 | 13 | 13 | 6 | 56:46 | 45 | |
| 7 | 32 | 11 | 12 | 9 | 40:53 | 42 | |
| 8 | 32 | 9 | 13 | 10 | 40:42 | 37 | |
| 9 | 32 | 9 | 13 | 10 | 40:56 | 37 | |
| 10 | 32 | 9 | 17 | 6 | 44:55 | 33 | |
| 11 | 32 | 8 | 17 | 7 | 38:55 | 31 | |
| 12 | 32 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 15:124 | 1 |
Predictions are statistical analysis for information only, not betting advice or a guarantee. 18+. Please gamble responsibly.