Bodo-Glimt vs Lillestrom: Team Comparison
Bodo-GlimtvsLillestrom 
Comparing Bodo-Glimt and Lillestrom across the metrics that matter, the model leans toward Bodo-Glimt — a 75% win probability once the bookmaker margin is stripped out. The draw sits at 14%. Below, the head-to-head numbers show where that edge comes from.
The detail backs this up: Bodo-Glimt carry the stronger recent form, Bodo-Glimt project for more goals (2.23 xG), Lillestrom have the better head-to-head record. Read together, these are the factors separating the two sides — not a single number but the weight of several pointing the same way.
| Bodo-Glimt | Metric | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 76 | Strength rating | 45 |
| 75% | Win probability | 11% |
| W L W L W | Recent form | W L L W L |
| 1 | Head-to-head wins | 5 |
| 2.23 | Expected goals | 0.45 |
Comparison based on odds, recent form and head-to-head data. For information only — not betting advice. 18+.
Who is more likely to win, Bodo-Glimt or Lillestrom?
The model favours Bodo-Glimt at 75%, with the draw at 14%.