← All predictions
Netherlands. Eredivisie

Telstar vs ADO Den Haag: Prediction, Odds & Analysis

Telstar TelstarvsADO Den Haag ADO Den Haag
Our predictionTelstar to win
Model score: High · 79/100
Score hint: 1-0

The model puts Telstar at 51%. The model leans toward Telstar. Confidence: high.

Why this prediction

+ supports the predicted pick, − argues against it.

Win probabilities

1 · Telstar51%
Draw24%
2 · ADO Den Haag25%
1 · TelstarDraw2 · ADO Den Haag
Full team comparison →

Model vs market

Markets where our model disagrees with the bookmaker. A positive edge means our model rates the outcome more likely than the odds imply. This is model disagreement, not proven value — we do not yet publish historical profitability.

BTTSNo2.50+39.4%
1X2Telstar2.00+3.3%
1X2Draw3.68-1.6%
1X2ADO Den Haag3.52-1.7%
BTTSYes1.47-39.4%
Our model BookmakerPositive edge = model disagreement, not a value bet. Not betting advice.

Recent form

TelstarDLWDL
ADO Den HaagLDLDW
Team strength rating
Telstar
58
ADO Den Haag
35

Expected goals

0.92Telstar
xG
0.50ADO Den Haag
Over 2.5 goals17%
Both teams to score24%

Most likely scorelines

0-024.2%
1-022.3%
0-112.0%
1-111.1%
2-010.3%
2-15.1%

Match DNA

AttackDefenseFormStrengthH2HVenue
Telstar ADO Den Haag

Key points

Betting angles

MarketPickOddsAssessment
1X2Telstar win2.00Fair (+3.3%)

Assessments compare our model probability with the bookmaker odds. A positive edge means our model rates the pick higher than the market implies — model disagreement, not proven value. Not betting advice.

Scoreline probability matrix

H \ A012345
024123
122113
21051
332
4
5

Each cell shows the probability (%) of that exact scoreline (home goals down the side, away goals across the top). Computed from a Poisson model on expected goals.

Full analysis

The model puts Telstar at 51%. The model puts the draw at 24%. The model puts ADO Den Haag at 25%. The model's most likely scoreline is 1-0.

The market leans toward Telstar. Telstar is priced at 2.005. The draw is priced at 3.68. ADO Den Haag is priced at 3.52.

Telstar have won 6 of the head-to-head meetings. ADO Den Haag have won 3 of the head-to-head meetings. The sides have drawn 6 of their head-to-head meetings.

Telstar have 1 wins in their last 5 matches. ADO Den Haag have 1 wins in their last 5 matches.

Telstar average 1 goals per game this season. Telstar average 61% possession. ADO Den Haag average 0 goals per game this season. ADO Den Haag average 46% possession.

The model gives 24% for both teams to score. The model gives 17% for over 2.5 goals.

This prediction is a statistical analysis, not a guarantee. Higher confidence means the signals agree more strongly, but football is unpredictable. Always bet responsibly.

Prediction Track Record →Methodology →Model card →

Frequently asked questions

Who is the favourite, Telstar or ADO Den Haag?

Our model rates Telstar as the most likely outcome at 51% probability.

What's a likely scoreline for Telstar vs ADO Den Haag?

A scoreline around 1-0 fits our analysis, as a pointer, not a certainty.

What's the head-to-head record?

In the last 15 meetings: 6 Telstar wins, 6 draws, 3 ADO Den Haag wins.

Over or under 2.5 goals?

The indicators lean toward under 2.5 goals.

See odds at bookmakers

League table

Netherlands. Eredivisie
#TeamGPWLTGPts
1AZ Alkmaar760118:619
2Feyenoord750225:717
3PSV Eindhoven751124:1016
4Twente751115:716
5Ajax741221:914
6Fortuna Sittard742113:1413
7Excelsior732215:911
8Groningen732215:1311
9Go Ahead Eagles721416:1410
10Heerenveen722311:99
11N.E.C.723212:138
12Sparta Rotterdam714210:175
13Telstar71425:125
14Cambuur714210:195
15Utrecht714211:245
16PEC Zwolle71516:204
17ADO Den Haag70527:172
18Willem II70526:202
Promotion - Champions League (League stage) Promotion - Champions League (Qualification) Promotion - Europa League (Qualification) Promotion - Higher League (UEFA Conference League Play-Off) Higher League (Relegation. Play-offs) Relegation - Division 1

Predictions are statistical analysis for information only, not betting advice or a guarantee. 18+. Please gamble responsibly.